The effective date
Current value and retrospective value answer different questions. Identify the legally relevant valuation date before the assignment begins.
Clear, impartial, well-supported appraisal services for Arizona family law attorneys, mediators, and divorcing property owners.
When the marital residence or another residential property is a significant asset, the assignment may require more than a current estimate. Cornerstone Appraisal develops a property-specific opinion of value supported by relevant market evidence and clearly explained reasoning.
Current fair market value for settlement discussions, mediation, or equitable distribution.
Independent support when one spouse may retain the property and buy out the other party’s interest.
Historical valuation for a date of marriage, separation, filing, or another legally relevant date.
Analysis of custom homes, acreage, guest houses, solar, green features, renovations, and atypical improvements.
A neutral valuation reference that can help narrow disagreements and support informed negotiation.
Carefully documented appraisal analysis designed to be understandable and withstand professional scrutiny.
I understand that family law assignments can be sensitive, time-dependent, and closely examined. My role is not to advocate for either party. It is to develop and communicate a credible opinion of value.
Eric Ranta has provided residential appraisal services in Arizona since 1998 and serves Maricopa and Pinal Counties, plus Globe–Miami and surrounding Gila County communities.
A practical checklist for spotting appraisal questions early in a matter.
Current value and retrospective value answer different questions. Identify the legally relevant valuation date before the assignment begins.
Renovations, damage, deferred maintenance, or occupancy changes can complicate a historical valuation. Contemporaneous photos and records may be important.
Owned versus leased solar, energy improvements, and certifications require property-specific market analysis rather than automatic dollar adjustments.
Guest houses, workshops, extensive remodeling, acreage, views, and unusual design can narrow the pool of meaningful comparable sales.
A jointly selected neutral appraiser may reduce competing opinions, while separate appraisers may be appropriate when each side requires independent advice. Counsel should define the intended use and users.
Property address, required effective date, relevant deadline, intended use and users, access contact, prior appraisals, renovation history, and any known disputed property characteristics.
General information only; not legal or tax advice. Assignment scope should be determined for the facts and intended use of each matter.
Yes. A retrospective appraisal can develop an opinion of value as of a prior effective date using historical market data and information about the property as it existed at that time.
That is a legal and strategic decision for the parties and counsel. When jointly engaged, the appraiser’s role remains independent and impartial; assignment terms should clearly identify the client, intended users, intended use, and effective date.
Not in every assignment. The appropriate scope depends on the effective date, intended use, available information, property complexity, and assignment conditions. Any limitations are disclosed in the report.
The property address, needed effective date, purpose of the valuation, relevant deadline, access information, and any known unusual features or changes to the property are the most useful starting points.
Send the property address, needed effective date, intended use, and deadline. I’ll review the assignment and respond directly.